This is merely a recording of my thoughts for now, and it is not meant to pass any judgements whatsoever. I do not pretend to possess any additional prior knowledge.
2011 is a very special year to a Singaporean. For years, Singaporeans have struggled with the question of identity. A country made up of immigrants from different parts of the world, speaking different languages, uniting together on one little island for one single common goal of survival. We search for the meaning of 'being Singaporean'. We search for a national costume, a national flower, a national emblem, a national icon, a national architectural style. We struggle to find what does it mean, a sense of belonging?
We have wonderful nation administrators that brought political, economic and social stability. The single-minded goal of the party resonated with the people, we will bring peace and prosperity to this little island. Our needs were fulfilled, we were satisfied. There were almost no questions, because there wasn't a need. However, came the generation that did not lay the foundation stone of the nation, but yet enjoyed the capable administration. Because of the high level of efficiency, there is almost no room for discourse; extra participation appeared simply to be liabilities.
Just as one claims ownership to his personal space through placing their possessions in specific areas, at a more macro level, political participation is also the way for one to feel belonged to a nation. There is a difference between having confidence, and being apathetic.
The information age has brought about heightened awareness. The need for accountability is increased, discourses are rampant. But here lies a beautiful thing. Everyone has a voice, and people are starting to realise that they have the ability to use it. Voices are no longer limited to the realm of the speaker's corner. Discourses are more often than not, a liability. A united, singular voice is the strongest, that is the belief of this nation's founding party. But unfortunately, people are not robots. To create an all-agreeing singular voice, can only mean voices are quelled, silenced. And a tunnel-vision in this day and age, is a ticking time-bomb.
Why 'administrators' and not 'politicians'? Politics is a dirty realm. Yet politicians are expected to appear to rise above that scum, inspire the people to believe in them, follow them, even die for them. They are the generals you see that leads the charge, yelling the war cry that strikes a cord with every citizen. Not everyone is suited to be one, because it is not simply 'a job'. Like a nurse, or a monk, it is a calling and a passion. Pays little, gives little thanks, but yet you're there because that is where you belong. Administrators are systematic beings whom presence are imperative cogs to keep the country running, they are never able to achieve the above.
Why do we need such high salaries? Because we are hiring highly qualified administrators, not true blue politicians. It appears that the ruling party fears discourse. Perhaps I am naive, but if agreement can only bring us this far, perhaps a dose of discourse is needed to inject new blood, stir the pot. There is no greater lesson than a mistake, so some mistakes have to be made, before you know they really are mistakes. It is not to say that we should act brashly, and oppose for the sake of opposing. But that there is a need to look for a new way of governance, because of the old reliable methods, are no longer robust enough to support the needs of today.
As a Singaporean, it feels great to have a voice at last, and to see the people around me being so active after lying dormant for so long. For the first time, I feel that I am not Singaporean merely because I love chicken rice, but because I have a stake in this land.